http://books.google.com/books?id=VWedB7SA-KMC&pg=PA55&lpg=PA55&dq=%22The+role +of+art+was+nobler+than+mere+pleasure+because+it+existed+for+the+purpose+of+i nstruction.%22&source=bl&ots=KfUe9jOaph&sig=JGheLlFpSlp8OuIYACOe4lq2SX4&hl=en #v=onepage&q=%22The%20role%20of%20art%20was%20nobler%20than%20mere%20pleasure %20because%20it%20existed%20for%20the%20purpose%20of%20instruction.%22&f=fals e
- "The role of art was nobler than mere pleasure because... joseph berg
- Re: "The role of art was nobler than mere pleasur... William Conger
- Re: "The role of art was nobler than mere ple... saul ostrow
- Re: "The role of art was nobler than mere... William Conger
