In a message dated 9/20/12 7:57:34 AM, [email protected] writes:
> The Bravo show was awful, but not awful enough for TV. A new, 'awfuler' > show > will take its place. > Ever since the 19C artists and writers began to merge real life and art, > the > vulgar and depressing side > of real life has always outpaced art. Art can never match real life in > that > respect. However, art can be good at > reaching beyond the grasp of real life --- its aspirations and ideals -- > and > that's where we always find the > best art. > wc > Put another way: Too little of the new product of most would-be "artists" would earn the honorific "art" from the majority of us -- far too little to afford Bravo worthy subject-matter week after week.
