I love the multi-universe idea. ManFont gives us a good synopsis. wc
----- Original Message ---- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, November 12, 2012 4:56:28 PM Subject: Differentiation in the Universe (was Re: Error and quality) While not a astrophysicist, but an architect who has always been fascinated by the cosmos, many of the latest theories regarding the multiverse (meta-universe) may offer a way to view your question. If an infinite set of universes exist, or an extremely high number; then the differentiation that occurred in ours may have just have been random. This differentiation occurs right at the beginning where the laws for the particular universe occur (the law of physics), at random, and then all subsequent differentiations continue from that beginning. In our universe: 1) the slight unevenness throughout of initial temperatures and 2) that particles and anti-particles canceled themselves out, except our beginning had a bit more of the positive particles facilitated the differentiation that is our universe. So here we are pondering how amazing and unlikely we are to be pondering things, but it could have been no other way. Likewise the differentiation that occurs within our human brains follows and ultimately expresses the nature of our universe; we must differentiate. Luis Fontanills In a message dated 11/12/2012 12:02:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: On Nov 11, 2012, at 4:04 PM, William Conger <[email protected]> wrote: > It is reasonable to say that in Nature there are no errors. > > Your question really is, Why do people find error in Nature? I was thinking of "error" in the scientific or mathematical sense of variation, more than in the sense of wrong judgment. Perhaps I should call it "differentiation": how did hydrogen become helium? How did one become two? Of the infinity of numbers, there is only one "1," one undifferentiated unity. There is no diversification in one, no differentiation. But when there are two, there can be differences. As I ponder this idea, I wonder if there was an original "need" for diversification. The Big Bang produced many entities. How was it that they were different rather than all being identical, all being the same kind, all charmed quarks or Higgs bosons or other identical elemental particles? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael Brady
