The very reason i can express with the nude figure what can be understood
universally by all, in endless ways.

ab

On Dec 11, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Michael Brady wrote:

> I like to do tough crossword puzzles, especially Tte big, 250-word NYT
Sunday
> puzzles edited by Will Shortz. He writes very clever and convoluted clues.
>
> Some of Shortz's clues have only one answer, e.g. "Tinkers to Evers to
> ______." Others rely on word play and misdirection. They are sneaky, and
some
> are very sneaky. What is "Notes from short people"? Who would refer to
people
> as "short"? Isn't that insensitive? What are the notes, a musical term?
> Stickies? Things slipped between students in school? Then I got it: IOUs.
> "Short people" = people who can't cover a debt.
>
> My point: When I can't figure out the clue, that occurs because the
meaning,
> i.e., what I am thinking of, doesn't jibe with the clue. Or its degree of
> jibeness is too iffy, too tenuous, too *unconvincing.*
>
> Cheerskep harps on the thought that is in my head, the answer, ultimately
"the
> meaning" of the clue. (I think my story of crossword clues is a perfect
> analogy to what he is worried about.) I am harping on how the jibing
occurs,
> how I know whether my answer suffices or whether it is an imprecise or
> improbable fit.
>
> William referred to "shared interpretations," which is similar to
> Wittgenstein's use in a language community. I want to examine and wrassle
with
> the idea of how the inanimate thing preserves a way of signaling a notion
to
> others remote in distance, time, and culture.
>
> BTW, Cheerskep often rails against "the" meaning of a word, and the
examples
> he gives are all nouns, verbs, adjectives or adverbs. These are the four
> categories of English words that are open, that easily admit new words.
Three
> other categories--prepositions, pronouns, conjunctions--are not open to new
> additions. They are function words and are used to connect words from the
> first four groups together in generally comprehensible statements.
>
>
>
> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> Michael Brady

Reply via email to