unless both are trite and committed to platitudes

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:32 PM, armando baeza <[email protected]> wrote:

> One's words and one's art seem to never  match.
>
> ab
>
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 9:31 AM, saul ostrow wrote:
>
> > its really a question of what history (ideology) one indexes their view
> to,
> > for most of us 100 years of modernism seeming set critical and crucial
> > criteria and established a set of standards for the evaluation of the
> new -
> > and the displacement or revision of those traditions that preceeded this
> > grand experiment
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 9:57 AM, William Conger
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> Junk.
> >> wc
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: joseph berg <[email protected]>
> >> To: aesthetics-l <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Sun, January 6, 2013 2:53:29 AM
> >> Subject: "Too little is asked and too little is expected of artists,
> >> critics,
> >> and curators...."
> >>
> >> http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/blog/jcontursi/art-richard-abraham
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > S a u l   O s t r o w
> >
> > *Critical  Voices*
> > 21STREETPROJECTS
> > La    Table   Ronde
> > 162 West 21 Street
> > NYC,    NY   10011
> >
> > [email protected]
> > www.21stprojects.org
>
>


-- 
 S a u l   O s t r o w

*Critical  Voices*
21STREETPROJECTS
La    Table   Ronde
162 West 21 Street
NYC,    NY   10011

[email protected]
www.21stprojects.org

Reply via email to