It is not really required for 844E alone, but you need it for 844E+804Mesh.


> On 1 Oct 2018, at 21:57, Carl Peterson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> For people using 844Es and 804 Mesh units.  Are you using Consumer Connect 
> for the Gigacenters?  Is it required to be able to manage the mesh units?  
> 
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:44 PM Craig Schmaderer <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> We are using the Calix 844e as well.  I charge $10 for managed router, 
> probably above 80% take rate.  If we determine that the house needs a 804 
> mesh or if they have problem issues with just include it in the $10 they are 
> already paying.  So far I would say 1 out of 20 gets an 804.  Hopefully it 
> stays that way or I might start maybe adding on a $50 setup or something to 
> get part of the 804 back. 
> 
>  
> 
> From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf 
> Of Kurt Fankhauser
> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 1:03 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Improving WIFI coverage in homes
> 
>  
> 
> Do the aircubes work with the Unifi cloud interface for management?
> 
>  
> 
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM Rory Conaway <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> We were using the Air Cube ACs also on Ubiquiti installations and the Mimosa 
> G2s on Mimosa installations specifically because of the repeater abilities.
> 
>  
> 
> Rory
> 
>  
> 
> From: AF [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On 
> Behalf Of Erich Kaiser
> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 9:05 AM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Improving WIFI coverage in homes
> 
>  
> 
> We use the Ubiquiti AirCube AC and add an additional unit in repeater mode if 
> needed.  So far they are working great got about 40 in the field.  They are 
> also our POE source going forward, for ubiquiti radios and fiber ONU.  All 
> managed through UNMS.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:30 AM Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> Been having a lot of customers lately calling about poor wifi coverage, I 
> always install the router in a prime location in house and when digging into 
> details further finding out that they are trying to use the wifi outside, or 
> by the pool or in the garage. What is everyone doing to accommodate these 
> peoples requests? Add another Mikrotik AP and charge additional $10/month for 
> each extra AP's? I want to offer a solution but at the same time make it 
> worth my time dealing with them. Seems to me i should be walking away with 
> minimum $500 for getting flawless wifi coverage in their house plus more 
> monthly fee.
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>-- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Carl Peterson
> 
> PORT NETWORKS
> 
> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
> 
> Baltimore, MD 21202
> 
> (410) 637-3707 
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to