Damn! I went from 6G to 10G to XG and then I read the rest of the thread.
I've always liked company names that don't get too wrapped up into what the
"current" product is. Something more malleable, like Google or Yahoo or
Enron.
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:39 AM dave <[email protected]> wrote:
> Im leaning towards the whole XG thingy
>
>
> On 3/7/19 7:01 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>
> Why 5G? The president wants 6G, you should do that. Or maybe 9G, that
> sounds better.
>
> Mark
>
> On Mar 6, 2019, at 8:50 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> So has anyone here using the term 5G in their company name or marketing?
>
> Would that be bad to do? Or would it be riding the ‘wave’ of marketing
> about to flood the cell phone market?
>
> Any drawbacks to using it now for marketing or part of a company name etc?
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
> --
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
