It’s 17.5 inches and it doesn’t perform like 26 dBi, so I guess that means not 
a good feed?

 

Smelly cat, smelly cat, what are they feeding you?

 

What if it’s just shaped like a Cassegrain feed but actually the tube is 
stuffed full of electronics and they have a couple of PCB dipoles at the end or 
something like that?  Would that hurt antenna gain?

 

I’ve been puzzled how the 450b can have higher xmt power than the old SM yet 
fit inside the feed tube, you’d think there would be a problem with heat 
dissipation.

 

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 4:19 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] Re: [*] corrective optics

 

A 17.5” reflector with a good feed should have about 26 dBi.  

 

From: Ken Hohhof 

Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 3:08 PM

To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] Re: [*] corrective optics

 

It’s around 18.5 inches but the actual reflector part is 17.5 inches, with a 
0.5 inch flat area all around the edge.

 

From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf 
Of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 2:43 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] Re: [*] corrective optics

 

Thanks, that helped a bunch.  It is like a Rocket.

Could be over illumination, under illumination or just too small of a reflector 
for the gain.

What is the diameter of the reflector?  Looks like it is about 20 inches or so.

 

Someone take a hammer and break open the feed and snap a photo for me.... save 
the pieces so you can glue it back together later...

 

From: Ken Hohhof 

Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 1:26 PM

To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] Re: [*] corrective optics

 

I’m busy configuring a licensed link or I’d snap a photo.  But here’s a Cambium 
video of assembling a 450b high gain, maybe you can glean enough from this.  
Note that there is an optional radome that snaps onto the front of the dish, 
they don’t show it in the video, but some of us like the radomes for 
aesthetics/windload/snow.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z88P-0nZkZ8 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z88P-0nZkZ8&feature=youtu.be> &feature=youtu.be

 

 

From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf 
Of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 1:54 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] Re: [*] corrective optics

 

Yes, I could probably google it, but I would like to have an image of the SM 
and reflector or whatever that is underperforming.  

 

From: Ken Hohhof 

Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:17 PM

To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] Re: [*] corrective optics

 

I think he meant a photo of a Cambium 450b, or something relevant to improving 
the antenna performance thereof.

 

What were you thinking the topic was about?

 

 

From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf 
Of Carl Peterson
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 1:05 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] Re: [*] corrective optics

 

"What would you like to see?"

 

I'm OK with the spam, but if this thread goes the wrong way I might need to 
unsubscribe.  No offense, just not my bag.  

 

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:06 AM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

What would you like to see?

Mark


On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

How about some photos.

Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 28, 2019, at 6:58 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

If you ever do the experiment again, it would be interesting to rotate the 
antenna to see if there’s some kind of sidelobe pointed toward the ground or 
something.  Obviously you can’t install it rotated or upside down (unless you 
really trust that cable gland to seal against rain), but it would be 
interesting to see the results.  Like you said, maybe some component in the 
feed horn is blocking the RF.

 

Cambium is in a better position to investigate this, it’s disappointing if they 
aren’t taking it seriously.

 

 

From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf 
Of Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 6:19 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [*] corrective optics

 

 

 

On Mar 27, 2019, at 10:11 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

In another thread, Mark Radabaugh posted:

 

“For your next product….   Corrective optics for 450B high gain CPE!”

 

Mark, I’m not sure if you were serious, I suspect yes.

 

 

Yes - but I’m not sure what is possible with the design.

 

 

I know it’s frustrating that the antenna gain is lower than the old reflector 
dish, Cambium dropped the number on the spec sheet to 24 dBi, but I think even 
that is optimistic, I think it’s about 2 dB less than the old combo which was 
supposed to be 25 dBi.  Lower antenna gain is going the wrong way!  I don’t 
care if it does have higher xmt power, that does nothing for the downstream 
direction.

 

 

Changing the spec sheet to match what they ended up with was a pretty big cop 
out when the product failed to meet design expectations.   

 

 

In calling for corrective optics, do you have any info or even a gut feel for 
whether the problem is in the feed or the dish?  Is it as simple as the dish is 
just too small?

 

 

I suspect that they managed to block part of the antenna feed horn with other 
components.  

 

 

 

Also, is it just the gain is low, or does the 450b hi gain have other issues?  
Like poor F/B or sidelobe performance or something?

 

It seems like if the 450b high gain is far away from other surfaces it works 
mostly to spec but when mounted in the typical locations near rooftops it seems 
like it either picks up more destructive multipath interference than previous 
designs or the antenna pattern distorts badly.  For a long time I thought they 
didn’t manage to get the feedhorn in the focus of the dish but Cambium assures 
me that it’s right.   We are seeing decent performance under 5 miles but it 
seems to fall apart much quicker over 5 miles than would be expected.

 

We set up a test with the bucket truck and drove it out and measured every mile 
to 10 and it came back fine - but that was 50’ in the air with nothing around.  
 Yet swapping out standard 450 SM’s with beehive or KP dishes with 450B’s at >5 
miles routinely fails with poor signal.   The difference is often far more than 
the 2dB the spec sheets would indicate.   Sometimes it works if the antenna is 
well away from all other surfaces like on a tower but for the majority of 
installs the swap fails.   Why were we doing that anyway?  We wanted to start 
using 5.1/5.2.

 

 

I know the 450b mid-gain is frustrating because apparently Cambium doesn’t 
think a tight vertical pattern is important.  I keep wondering if a top and 
bottom flap like on the old 2.4 Stingers would correct that.

 

Cambium seems to be sharing antenna designs between ePMP and 450, so the same 
issues probably exist in the corresponding ePMP products.

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
 <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

 

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




 

-- 

Carl Peterson

PORT NETWORKS

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707 

  _____  

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

  _____  

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

  _____  

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to