10-4, then youll have to get that new Xgen fiber upgrade :)
On 6/17/19 2:33 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Analog brains actually require more bandwidth.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 6/17/2019 12:08 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Depends on the brain. 3G would probably be plenty for mine.
*From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *dave
*Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2019 1:49 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] the start of the 6G hype?
Its going to tap the inner synapses of your brain... TONS of data :)
Welcome the PETRA bit LOL
On 6/17/19 1:21 PM, Tim Withrow via AF wrote:
The hype and timelines for the evolution of 5,6,7 and 8G seems
scrambled and undefined now. Maybe Korea will lead the way with
a even better network evolution to jump over the hype and just
implement what works.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Monday, June 17, 2019 Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Just really makes me scratch my head. What the heck does
remote AI have to do with needing huge data transfer schemes?
Unless we are talking about seriously expanding the type of
sensor data there isn’t much more input or output data to
transfer back and forth between the end user device and the
remote computer than what can already be done. Two, maybe three
video streams, a couple audio channels, a few other lower data
rate streams and you pretty much have it.
Mark
On Jun 17, 2019, at 10:09 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
At first I assumed this was a joke or satire, but apparently not.
https://venturebeat.com/2019/06/14/researchers-say-6g-will-stream-human-brain-caliber-ai-to-wireless-devices/
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
