Google WiFi is a hateful piece of misery. On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:34 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, that’s good. > > > > I have mostly seen routers default to 5745. My nemesis Google WiFi > definitely doesn’t not choose 5180. Back when U-NII-1 and U-NII-2 were the > indoor bands, of course the router manufacturers ignored that and went for > the outdoor band. Like you’re really going to put a 20 dBi external > antenna on your Linksys router or your laptop. > > > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Thursday, July 4, 2019 9:45 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] do most customer devices support U-NII-1? > > > > Yeah, 5ghz wasn't that common in consumer devices before the changes > anyway, so pretty much everything should support UNII-1 just fine. I've > noticed a lot of routers default to 5180mhz. > > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we set a customer’s router to use the U-NII-1 sub-band (for example > 5180 MHz Ceee), are there going to be devices that can’t connect? > > > > I think U-NII-1 was always allowed by FCC, so it seems all devices should > support it. The change around 5 years ago was to allow higher xmt power or > antenna gain or something? > > > > And will there be a performance penalty compared to U-NII-3? I know > that’s not a simple question due to OOB emissions requirements and depends > on hardware, but in general, will the performance be similar? For example, > on a Mikrotik hAP ac or 4011? Not that Mikrotik is the poster boy for FCC > 5 GHz support. > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
