Well, they did different levels. The Louisville ones were nanotrenches at around 2" deep. Austin was maybe microtrenches at 4" and has stood the test of time better. Then again, frost and plow trucks aren't really a thing in Texas.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 11:42:46 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] This Question Again I heard Google's microtrenches were only a few inches deep. If they got it down to 10" then road resurfacing shouldn't be an issue. The same source told me Google didn't use the proper backfill. The story was that the flowable fill needs an epoxy additive when the microtrench is above the frost depth. I've never microtrenched anything myself, so this is all hearsay. On 1/2/2020 11:58 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote: Don't microtrench if you can avoid it. Road resurfacing and cuts for other utilities makes this a hassle. Google abandoned their entire microtrenched plant in Louisville after the resurfacing projects, or aging infrastructure repairs caused so many outages. On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 12:16 PM Gino A. Villarini < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Sorry, I know this question has been asked in the past many times but I need to ask It again: Whats the avg cost per mile of microtrench fiber in pavement? And in Soil? Gino Villarini Founder/President @gvillarini t: 787.273.4143 Ext. 204 m: aeronet-logo inc500 fb-logo insta-logo in-logo tw-logo yt-logo www.aeronetpr.com | Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, PR 00968 -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com </blockquote> -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
