Well, you gotta admit, we all have had 20 years of buying some cheap cisco 
device and then getting all the software we wanted for our used expensive cisco 
stuff.  I always felt slightly guilty doing it that way but it seemed to be the 
defacto way in the industry.  I presume they allowed it to stimulate the market 
in a particular way.  

From: Josh Baird 
Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2020 3:06 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Juniper routers

In some ways, Juniper isn't any better than Cisco in terms of licensed software 
features and it seems to only be getting worse.  Some features (on *some* 
platforms) are honor based, but lots are not and require a license.  You can 
purchase licenses from any Juniper reseller.  I'm not sure what the process is 
for getting J-Care on used/grey-market gear, as I have never tried to do that. 

You need an active support contract in order to download software from their 
website, although it's not as restrictive as Cisco's which now requires you to 
have a contract on a specific device to get firmware for that device iirc.  

On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 4:45 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

  Seems like a good question to ask the burning question I've had about juniper 
and specifically how juniper deals with license/firmware updates, etc. 

  We've been a cisco shop since day one.  Over the years they've gotten more 
and more aggressive with their licensing requirements and controlled access to 
firmware updates.  At this point they seem to care less about selling hardware 
and are more about extracting as much license and support revenue as possible 
which makes picking up a used router a much riskier proposition.

  How does juniper handle this type of stuff, especially in relation to used 
gear?  And in the context of getting the right software features (bgp, 
reasonable number of ospf routes, etc) enabled.  And so on. 

  On Tue, Dec 31, 2019, 7:39 PM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> wrote:

    Not necessarily.  Depending on model many have redundant routing engines, 
multiple power supplies, fan trays, etc.   You may want to have spare cards and 
possibly a empty chassis in the really odd event of a backplane issue.  All 
depends on you risk tolerance. 

    Mark


    Mark Radabaugh 
    Amplex
    22690 Pemberville Rd
    Luckey, OH 43443
    419-261-5996


      On Dec 31, 2019, at 9:18 PM, Jon Langeler <[email protected]> 
wrote:


      Does one have to buy two of these for redundancy as we do with our 
current but smaller routers?


      Jon Langeler
      Michwave Technologies, Inc.



        On Dec 31, 2019, at 11:11 AM, Gino A. Villarini <[email protected]> 
wrote:


         
        Can go wrong with juniper.. I’ll vouch for the MX204’s great units. Our 
Core is MX480 soon to be upgraded to MX10003



        Gino Villarini 
        Founder/President
        @gvillarini
        t: 787.273.4143 Ext. 204 
        m: 


                         
        www.aeronetpr.com | Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, PR 00968 
        From: AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Josh Baird 
<[email protected]>
        Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
        Date: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 at 11:41 AM
        To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Juniper routers



        Overall, the JunOS syntax is far more powerful and nicer to use (once 
you learn it) than IOS in my opinion.



        On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:17 AM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> wrote:

          Syntax is a different but there are a lot of things you will like 
compared to the older IOS versions.    ‘commit confirmed 5’ alone is worth 
changing for.  

          Mark

          > On Dec 31, 2019, at 8:43 AM, Larry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
          > 
          > This first one will replace our primary backbone router
          > 
          > Mainly just curious what my learning curve is going to be
          > and if there were "resources" here to help when I shoot
          > myself in the foot.
          > 
          > -- 
          > Larry Smith
          > [email protected]
          > 
          > On Mon December 30 2019 16:28, Josh Baird wrote:
          >> Several people here use Juniper.
          >> 
          >> What role are you putting the MX240 in?  What would you like to 
know?
          >> 
          >> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 5:13 PM Larry Smith <[email protected]> 
wrote:
          >>> Curiousity question.
          >>> We are getting ready to replace our Cisco 7206-VXR G2 router
          >>> with a Juniper MX240 and just wondering how many here actually
          >>> use Juniper.  Trying to do some reading and figure out what I am
          >>> in for in the conversion.
          >>> 
          >>> --
          >>> Larry Smith
          >>> [email protected]
          >>> 
          >>> --
          >>> AF mailing list
          >>> [email protected]
          >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
          > 
          > -- 
          > AF mailing list
          > [email protected]
          > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


          -- 
          AF mailing list
          [email protected]
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

        -- 
        AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

  -- 
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to