The Navigator has the feature where you can combine 2 adjacent channels to increase capacity.. I.e. 2x50Mhz H and 2x50Mhz V, potentially giving double the capacity of the Aviat radio running 1x50Mhz H and 1x50Mhz V. There is a bridgewave webinar about the feature tomorrow.
Peter Kranz <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> pkr...@unwiredltd.com From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 9:41 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave 11GHz I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core version is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably in part due to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator. On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com <mailto:joshba...@gmail.com> > wrote: I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput (~3Gbps if you have the channels available). The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each capable of ~1.4Gbps. On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> > wrote: Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat WTM4200 vs Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding. -Jason -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
