For many people, that seems to mean stop funding the police to deal with issues 
like mental health, homelessness, domestic disputes, street vendors, routine 
discipline in schools, etc., and instead use that money to fund specialists, 
and let the police handle murders and robberies and stuff.

 

I had a discussion with someone who is all for defund the police and I said if 
that’s what they mean, the term really sucks, because it conveys something 
totally different and many people are not going to support something that 
sounds like disband the police and then nobody handles murders and robberies.  
Rather than saying reform the police, or narrow their focus, or move some of 
their responsibilities to other agencies.  But he said I was wrong, without 
really explaining why I was wrong.  I think he meant we can call it what we 
want to, who cares if it’s unnecessarily provocative.  Or maybe he really does 
want to disband the police.

 

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of justsumname .
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 6:14 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: [AFMUG] OT: batcrazy

 

is it just the 'news' that I'm reading or are things really going totally 
bathshitcrazy ?!?     "de-fund the police" .... is just ONE thing.

 

---

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to