I thought it reduced the surface area of the contact so more energy would go 
into less area of your butt.  
But the paddle was softball compared to a maple meter stick.  I had a 6th grade 
teacher swing one on me like he was driving off of a tee.  
Wow did that hurt.  But I did not let out a peep.  

From: Robert 
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 9:17 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: batcrazy

I thought the holes were so that it semi-pinched on the skin upon impact to 
give an "extra" kick...


On 6/16/20 7:41 AM, Bill Prince wrote:

  Most of the teachers in grade school carried a paddle whenever we had a large 
gathering (like when we were in line for lunch). Some of the more aggressive 
teachers drilled large holes in their paddles to allow them to swing harder.

  I was never sure of the effectiveness of that.


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 6/16/2020 7:35 AM, [email protected] wrote:

    I remember teachers getting into fistfights with kids in HS.  Teacher was 
never in trouble.  

    From: Adam Moffett 
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:31 AM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: batcrazy

    One thing Steve pointed out that I can attest is a very real thing right 
now: teachers can't touch the kids at all.  Not just corporal punishment, but 
you can't push, pull, grab, manhandle, restrain, or anything of the sort.  They 
can't touch the kid at all.  My wife was doing before-school daycare at the 
elementary school (for parents who need to drop the kid of early and then get 
to work), and same rules applied to her.  She let one of the fifth graders in 
on the secret that the only thing she can really do to a kid is talk sternly.  
She needed the bigger kid as an ally to set the tone of behavior for all the 
other kids.  If some troubled kid went berserk the only thing she'd really be 
able to do is call the police.


    So I don't think it was about school shootings.  I think they just need 
someone around who is allowed to do something if a kid gets out of control.



    On 6/16/2020 10:19 AM, Bill Prince wrote:

      It's all about the escalation of threat. Somebody shoots up a school, 
then we have to arm all the schools (what's wrong with that idea?). Give them 
MRAPs too. That's a good way to spend money.



bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 6/15/2020 8:11 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

        When did they start having cops in schools?  Never once in my K-12 days 
did I see a policeman in my school.  I’ll have to ask my kids if they ever did. 
 Maybe I led a privileged life.

         

        College had “campus cops” but they were kind of a joke, mostly 
relegated to writing parking tickets.

         

         

        From: AF mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
        Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 9:45 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: batcrazy

         

        Not around here. That must be an Illinois thing. I left that place 
sometime around 1967.

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2020 7:42 PM, Steve Jones wrote:

          you ever seen a podunk meth dealers arsenal?

           

          On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:33 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> 
wrote:

            I think one of the things they want to do is de-militarize the 
police. Local podunk PDs have no business buying million dollar MRAPs.

             

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2020 7:29 PM, Steve Jones wrote:

              the problem is the defund the police folks dont understand 
economics. there isnt enough money as it is for maintaining the police presence 
for the criminal side of things. taking that money and paying for a bunch of 
counsellors doesnt lead to having enough cops. Removing police from schools is 
a 1 percent thing, the other 99 percent will pull their kids out without 
resource officers. Mental health still will need police, they dont go to a hot 
environment because they dont have arrest powers if it goes downhill, and you 
dont want jonna the counselor having to fight the loon.  

              They want to disarm the police. thats a big no, complete non 
starter. They consider the bullet proof vests to be a mechanism of 
intimidation, anyone who has actually had a vest do its job would never let 
somebody else go in without one.

              Maybe they try an actual wholistic approach, stop making 
everything illegal, and you immediately have less criminals

              stop overcharging for pleas, Mike flynn being an ally example I 
wish they would recognize. The media says if he wasnt guilty, why would he take 
a plea? I can find you thousands of young black men who can answer that 
question without skipping a beat.

              Get rid of plea bargains all together, make DAs actually work for 
their conviction rates at trial, bet you see a less burdened court and prison 
system right quick.

              Prisons cost 30-70k annually per inmate. Thats a whole lot of 
dough to put into those other programs, and over time that cost goes down as 
guards age out and dont need to be replaced because the cells are empty.

               

              defund the police is targeting a symptom of a virus and giving it 
an antibiotic (its the wrong treatment)

               

              On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:38 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> 
wrote:

                For many people, that seems to mean stop funding the police to 
deal with issues like mental health, homelessness, domestic disputes, street 
vendors, routine discipline in schools, etc., and instead use that money to 
fund specialists, and let the police handle murders and robberies and stuff.

                 

                I had a discussion with someone who is all for defund the 
police and I said if that’s what they mean, the term really sucks, because it 
conveys something totally different and many people are not going to support 
something that sounds like disband the police and then nobody handles murders 
and robberies.  Rather than saying reform the police, or narrow their focus, or 
move some of their responsibilities to other agencies.  But he said I was 
wrong, without really explaining why I was wrong.  I think he meant we can call 
it what we want to, who cares if it’s unnecessarily provocative.  Or maybe he 
really does want to disband the police.

                 

                 

                From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of justsumname .
                Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 6:14 PM
                To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
                Subject: [AFMUG] OT: batcrazy

                 

                is it just the 'news' that I'm reading or are things really 
going totally bathshitcrazy ?!?     "de-fund the police" .... is just ONE thing.

                 

                ---

                -- 
                AF mailing list
                [email protected]
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





            -- 
            AF mailing list
            [email protected]
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com






         

       

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -- 
    AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


     

   




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to