If we all actually paid for the news, we might. Just maybe. Get
more quality news.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
I'm pretty sure that's not compatible with the constitution. Although maybe you should need a license and a background check before you can publish anything posing as a fact. That might make the Internet safer. Except The Daily Show and Tucker Carlson are both satire instead of news, so they get a fair use exemption.
On 8/13/2020 6:25 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
I'm a fan of a press moratorium. We'd definetly be better informed if they would all shut down til January.I'm not allowed to state publicly what I want to do with them in the interim.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 5:14 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
--The words “is there a way we can do something like that” was a query by someone ignorant of what is possible in that realm.He was doing his stream of consciousness version of brainstorming.But that is not allowed when you are under the microscope. Partisans will pick any politician apart when they do things like this.Too bad we don’t have any real press, we just have propaganda outlets.From: Steve JonesSent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 4:04 PMSubject: Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"Except the UV light thing was already being done."It sounds off" said every person who didntOn Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 4:45 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
--What he literally said was:
"And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me."
He used the words disinfectant and injection together. Anyone listening would get the impression he was suggesting that disinfectant could be injected.
There was another part about UV light that sort of rambled around too.
bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>On 8/13/2020 1:41 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
To be fair, the President never said people should drink bleach. He remarked that it's so quick and easy to disinfect surfaces, then wondered out loud if it was possible to disinfect a human's insides, and then turned to the sidelines and asked someone off camera if they were looking into that.
It was still a huge head scratching / face palming moment, but he didn't actually say anyone should try to disinfect their insides by drinking bleach or any other means. I think the mis-characterizing of it made it too easy to say "he didn't say that". Really the story should not have been been about "President says people should drink bleach"; it should have been "why does the president need to ask that question?"
On 8/13/2020 3:24 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
So if Google told everyone to eat a bug, it would be yep, we’re eating bugs now?
President says to drink bleach, and 1% believe it. QAnon says Tom Hanks and Pope Francis are pedophiles, and 10 or 20% believe it? CDC says to wear masks, and 50% believe it. Google says eat a bug, and 99% start chowing down on six-leggers?
Even God seems to have lower credibility than Google. Should our currency say “In Google We Trust”?
From: AF mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 1:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google Chrome "Deceptive Site Ahead"
That's why I mentioned it. But he's not the only person in the world doing that.
On 8/13/2020 2:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>often intentionally make the page look like *their* customer's web page
And that's exactly what the warning is describing. https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/99020?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:35 PM Larry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu August 13 2020 13:28, Adam Moffett wrote:
> When Chrome users visit a customer's web server they're getting this
> "Deceptive Site Ahead" warning. It's not really my problem, but I want
> to help the guy if I can. Honestly theirs nothing obviously wrong with
> the site, except he provides a B2B service for other companies and they
> often intentionally make the page look like *their* customer's web
> page. Is that sufficient to trigger this, or is there something
> specific Google is looking for?
Typically this is an infected (contains malware) site.
--
Larry Smith
[email protected]
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
