That was a joke, son, a joke.... (foghorn leghorn)...   but WH would be a subtopic of OT...

On 8/22/20 11:50 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
AFAIK unless I missed the memo, we only have one special subject header; "OT:".

If we want to reclassify or maybe just classify we should discuss. 5G is what I would consider on-topic (an unfortunate turn for English that both on and off begin with o; maybe we should use the last letters FC for ofF topiC, and NC for oN topiC).

Nonetheless we do go down wormholes with alarming frequency. More sub-categories of off topic might be appropriate. However, when I'm slammed for time, I just ignore the OT: subjects until some other time.

--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:44 AM Robert <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I am going to define a new Type of Email header...   WH...  
    WormHole...

    On 8/22/20 11:06 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

    BTW, the last few Dilbert comics have been about 5G.

    https://dilbert.com/

    *From:* AF <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *cjwstudios
    *Sent:* Saturday, August 22, 2020 12:44 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5G

    Isn’t the only improvement in 5G larger channel widths?

    On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:42 PM <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        In the news:

            AT&T-owned Cricket Wireless is enabling 5G support on
            some of its

            plans, . . .  the company’s only 5G compatible device so
            far is the

            $1,199 Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus. And getting access to 5G
            on Cricket requires

            subscribing to one of its Unlimited plans, which start at
            $60 per month.

            Cricket will likely use AT&T’s low-band 5G network (the
            announcement

            didn’t specify much in the way of technical details),
            which uses low-band

            850MHz spectrum technology that has broader range but
            slower speeds than its

            mmWave 5G, which AT&T calls its 5G Plus network.

            The latter is currently limited to developers and select
            businesses.

            T-Mobile also offers its low-band 5G, which it launched
            in December, to its

            Metro prepaid customers.

        So, they are finally admitting (it appears) that 5G for
        mobile devices is

        marketing hype as we all have known. Just one number higher
        than 4G.

        If it uses low band then it is not anything new in my
        opinion.  mm wave for

        a mobile device is nothing more than a lab creature.  And I
        believe it will

        remain that way.



--
        AF mailing list

        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- AF mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to