Sprint has been using 2.5 GHz for their massive MIMO. 

I don't know the elevation intended. 


I agree that you're not going to see a 64x increase. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 1:58:30 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cell signals. 



For that to work well, you probably need (a) clear LOS (b) no foliage (c) no 
multipath (d) mid or high band freq and (e) CPE at various heights (like 
downtown office building) so you can use 3D beamforming. I’m not saying it 
won’t work, but you won’t get anything near 64x capacity increase. I think I 
was reading numbers like 5x. 

My gut tells me you can’t beamsteer with that precision at sub 1 GHz 
frequencies. But nobody said all 64 elements are in the same band either. 



From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 1:29 PM 
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cell signals. 


64x64 massive MIMO (like Cambium Medusa's 14x14) in each 120 degree sector. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----


From: "Ken Hohhof" < [email protected] > 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:02:48 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cell signals. 
That must mean something different than I was thinking. Like 64 time slices for 
different traffic, or dividing the 360 degrees into 64 antenna beams. 



From: AF < [email protected] > On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:11 PM 
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group < [email protected] > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cell signals. 


Sprint\T-Mo has done 64x64. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Ken Hohhof" < [email protected] > 
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:13:45 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cell signals. 
I still can’t wrap my head around how they get ∞x∞ MIMO and 1.21 giga watts 
bits from 5 MHz of spectrum. I understand MU-MIMO and beamsteering and all 
that, but when they start tossing around stuff like 8x8 MIMO I don’t see how 
you get that many orthogonal signals on the same frequency. 

But for maximum spectral efficiency, I assume they use more than 1 
polarization, whether V&H or +45 & -45. 



From: AF < [email protected] > On Behalf Of Chuck McCown 
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:54 PM 
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group < [email protected] > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cell signals. 

I have a passive antenna experiment in the works. Rather than guess at the 
right slant, I think I will try V pol initially. 

Sent from my iPhone 




On Sep 13, 2020, at 4:12 PM, Matt Hoppes < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


<blockquote>




When GSM began they started using vertical polarization. But as the need for 
capacity arose antennas changed to slant 45 X polarization. 


<blockquote>

On Sep 13, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Jaime Solorza < [email protected] > wrote: 
</blockquote>

<blockquote>




V 



On Sun, Sep 13, 2020, 3:48 PM Matt Hoppes < [email protected] > 
wrote: 
<blockquote>

Slant 45 

> On Sep 13, 2020, at 4:51 PM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> Are cell signals V pol? 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone 
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
</blockquote>

-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
</blockquote>

-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
</blockquote>


-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 


-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to