We are just installing a pair of 450m 3.65 and your options for sync are to run an ethernet cable down to a packetflux rackinjector but with no POE, just let it do sync, or to use a cnpulse which is just a gps receiver that plugs in directly to the 450m.
On a separate note, does anyone else hate these 4 pin power cables? To do it properly you need to make 5 ends and the small pins are so finicky to get into the connector. It took hours for us to make all the cables properly and verify. Frustrating. On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:17 AM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > What are the sync options for 450m? Poe+sync or aux port? No on-board gps > for self sync?? > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, 9:57 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Or just use a cnPulse/SyncBox or something like that at the top of the >> tower next to the radio.. so, you aren't running CAT5 all the way up your >> tower. >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:53 PM Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> Do you mean use fiber for ethernet connectivity but run cat5 for sync? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:55 AM Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> You can use single sync solutions per AP, so no Ethernet runs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Gino* >>>> *Villarini *Founder/President >>>> @gvillarini >>>> t: 787.273.4143 Ext. 204 >>>> [image: aeronet-logo] <http://www.aeronetpr.com/> [image: inc500] >>>> <https://www.inc.com/profile/aeronet> [image: fb-logo] >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/aeronetpr/> [image: insta-logo] >>>> <https://www.instagram.com/aeronetpr/?hl=en> [image: in-logo] >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeronet-broadband-corp> [image: >>>> tw-logo] >>>> <https://twitter.com/AeroNetPR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor> >>>> [image: yt-logo] >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr2Q9WBrAYVm3Fn970Jd6VA> >>>> www.aeronetpr.com | Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, PR 00968 >>>> >>>> *From: *AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>>> *Reply-To: *AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>> *Date: *Friday, September 25, 2020 at 10:05 AM >>>> *To: *AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't need no damn sync. I have a building with more than enough FTB. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:58 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> You (we) still need power+sync even if you use fiber.. We're planning >>>> on using fiber, too. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:53 AM Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Forgot all about that massive power requirement. We did DC+fiber to >>>> avoid ethernet issues. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:50 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think he said 3 GHz 450m which requires direct DC power because it >>>> uses like 1.21 gigawatts. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM >>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> If you need sync...power it over that too. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In my case, we don't need sync on our deployment so we went fiber + >>>> DC. No sync - we've got a bomb shelter building for a good bit of >>>> shielding. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:57 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I can’t remember last time I power cycled an AP, it’s been years. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Only time would be if I did something stupid and needed to do the quick >>>> power cycle to get into the Recovery Console. Usually that wouldn’t be an >>>> AP that’s in service, but one from the used pile that I’m planning to >>>> redeploy but I didn’t label where it came from. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sometimes after a year or two uptime some of the Ubiquiti stuff will go >>>> off to Lalaland and need a reboot, I had to do an old Powerbridge the other >>>> day, but I could still reboot it from the GUI. I had an old >>>> Karlnet/YDI/Terabeam/Proxim backhaul radio that needed to be power cycled >>>> regularly but that was 15 years ago and it got replaced with a PTP500 which >>>> has now been replaced with a PTP820. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:30 PM >>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that >>>> everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field >>>> techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...so when problems >>>> happen look there and try a reboot. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Sean >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:18 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> We're deploying our first 450M gear soon. This site will have a +48VDC >>>> ICT rectifier solution and DC distribution (managed). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We're going to be using a PacketFlux RackInkjector w/ Cambium Sync >>>> modules to provide sync to the 450M 3ghz radios. We could load a PDU >>>> module in the RackInjector as well to provide power to them. >>>> Alternatively, we could power them directly off of the ICT managed >>>> distribution. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Both solutions are managed (can turn them on/off via IP). Is there any >>>> reason to use the PacketFlux PDU module over the DC distribution panel in >>>> this scenario? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> AF mailing list >>>> >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
