Hence the next statement in what I said
There hasnt been any ruling, so there isnt any finality. There needs to be
finality. Scotus action today is just going to drag this thing out. Until
they do their job, hear the case, rule against the states, the propensity
for violence increases daily. And I'm not just talking about secessionists.
At least the next 2 years wont be anything like the left over the last four
still calling Clinton madame president and screaming at the sky. The right
will either pop off or move on. More likely to move on if the scotus does
their job and rules on it.
It's a real good forecast for starlink, the left lives funding a monopoly
they back. I'll bet scotus rules on that within 3 years, they wont claim
it's not in their wheelhouse
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 9:54 PM Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com> wrote:
> Appeal to whom? God?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 11, 2020, at 7:42 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
> In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a
> bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original
> jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___
> (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore
> grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not
> grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
>
> I'll break this down for bill and jaime to understand. The case itself is
> in the purview of SCOTUS. By not hearing it (and issuing a negative ruling
> on the merits, as the tone reflects) the issue would have been ended, also
> likely ending the other pending cases. All theyve done now is created a
> mechanism to appeal or refile, and refile, and refile. Irrelevant of the
> 14th december , the 3rd, or the 20th of January.
>
> You have two choices when your kids are fighting (you're kids are always
> your jurisdiction) you can tell the "I dont want to hear it" and spend the
> next few days listening to them bicker.
> Or you can have them tell you their gripes, then tell them to fuck off
> with a descriptive reason why, with clarity that if it comes before you
> again, the hand of god will strike them.
>
> Ultimately both outcomes are the same (they get sidetracked and move on to
> the next shiny object) only one is clear, and one leaves the door open for
> endless stupidity.
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 8:26 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Read the dissent, it's a lot less elementary school than "nyah nyah
>> pbthhh" and sticking fingers in the air
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 7:32 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If I was on the court (and to be clear, I am not, nor do I want to be),
>>> I would have denied the case with prejudice.
>>>
>>> Time for the followers of Trumpianity to find another church, and face
>>> reality.
>>>
>>> --
>>> bp
>>> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 4:20 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All these craven lackeys got a big fuck you from the SCOTUS...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
