this is part of that stupid sexual harrasment training we had to do
https://trackbill.com/bill/illinois-senate-bill-75-hotel-casino-employee-safety/1648594/
If I read it right, an on person dongle is sufficient

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:40 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I installed a panic button system for a contractor with several panic
> buttons in key locations near surveillance camera monitors covering all
> doors, parking lots and hall ways ..all of the management staff have small
> remotes they can use to trigger alarm and 100dB klaxon ...we test it every
> two months...all UHF...
> The controller can be wired and used for a lot more applications.
> I don't think I would trust WiFi based system...but I am open to learning
> about them.
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, 3:41 PM Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We're in Illinois, and provide Internet/WIFI to a hotel.  We're being
>> told by the hotel owner that there is a new regulation (we don't know if
>> it's state or federal) that there needs to be a panic button in every
>> room.
>>
>> The guy selling them the system says that it is all WIFI based.  1
>> device per room
>>
>> It is supposedly only for staff use
>>
>> So they're wanting to add a mess of devices to the WIFI in the hotel.
>> Not really a big deal, there's more than enough capacity.
>>
>> But A number of things are not making sense with this:
>>
>> Why would a Panic button be WIFI based and not 400khz to a local receiver?
>>
>> If it's only for staff, why is there a need for one in each room and not
>> just a panic button carried on their person?
>>
>> I know others on this list service/manage hotels.  Have you heard
>> anything about this?
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to