We just put up a WTM4200 link and latency across the link is consistently 0.5ms (or less).
What are you expecting? On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:25 AM Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > They have some more latency than saf, but (as a major saf fanboy this > pains me) their pricepoint is worth the hit > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, 9:53 PM Darin Steffl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yes it's 730+ Mbps full duplex per 80mhz channel. With XPIC, you have two >> channels so roughly 1460 Mbps full duplex for the link. These things rock. >> We love our WTM4200 >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:48 PM Jason McKemie < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think Ken from Aviat just answered my question. It looks like it is >>> about 1.4 Gbps FDX, so that is what I would expect. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:35 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In what? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, 8:55 PM Jason McKemie < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Those of you that have WTM 4200 links deployed in 11GHz, what are you >>>>> seeing throughput-wise in an 80MHz XPIC channel? It looks like around >>>>> 730mbps each way from what I can tell, but that doesn't seem right when I >>>>> get just north of 400mbps in a single-pol 56MHz channel. >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> Darin Steffl >> Minnesota WiFi >> www.mnwifi.com >> 507-634-WiFi >> Like us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
