Eh, I'd limit that to developed areas or areas otherwise too difficult to do with LEO or fixed wireless.
Rural areas with people, fixed wireless will still be king. Rural areas without people, LEO will be king. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 9:40:35 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] So it begins agan Even though it would put us out of biz, fiber is the need of the future. Every thing else is stop gap, for fixed locations. On 3/5/21 7:20 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: You would think that since they bothered coming up with excuses why the current standard isn't good enough, they could at least come up with a number based on their imagined need, instead of just coming up with a random number with no basis in anything other than "100/100 sounds good". It's not that hard... according to them, Zoom needs 3.8mbps upload per 1080p stream (and obviously everybody in the house absolutely needs to be using 1080p), so lets say a lot of households are running 5 simultaneous Zoom sessions (which I'm guessing is actually fairly rare)... that's 19Mbps, so throw in some overhead and make it, say 25Mbps. That's realistically going to be way more upload bandwidth than the vast majority of people ever need, so why exactly do we need to make the standard four times that? I guess it's one way to only fund fiber, which probably isn't a terrible idea if we're going to insist on throwing tax payer money away on such projects. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:21 PM Steve Jones < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> As long as they're tossing arbitrary numbers for need out there without any fact based justification I think we should get carte blanche to do as we please to make it happen. No need for ROW, we will take the O out of OTARD and give it a big fat REeeee. Dont want us running cable through your living room to your neighbors house? Move. That 300 year old oak is in the way? Federal money for husqvarna solutions. 1 watt per mhz? F that, 1.12 gigawatt at the cpe. We will burn those obstructions out of the way, make it disappear like micheal j fox in a Polaroid. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, 9:29 PM Ryan Ray < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Just create another CBRS database and let's get a huge swath of spectrum dedicated to PTMP without huge fees for rural areas. Lots of places where we could service 700-800 people if only more spectrum was available and it wouldn't impact anyone else in that band. If it does? Shut it off. Spectrum feels like such a wasted resource. We could be doing so much more with it, we understand how it propagates and software can now handle that on the fly in order to allocate to as many people as possible. I honestly think a fluid and dynamic database like this is the future of wireless. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:45 PM Steve Jones < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/4/22312065/fcc-highspeed-broadband-service-ajit-pai-bennet-angus-king-rob-portman Meth and kickbacks. They need to just free up 500mhz-120ghz for just WISP use. Then each wisp can have a ton of spectrum to get that porn to every device -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com </blockquote> -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com </blockquote> </blockquote> -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
