Uh oh. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 9:50 AM Jan Van Kort <[email protected]> wrote:
> So that would be a yes it does experience rain fade? It rains here and > heavy misting at least 6 months out of the year. > > I'm not finding that model on google, Mouser elect. seems to be an Aviat > dealer, not finding this model there, so I wouldn't know what freq this > model supports. Is it even produced anymore? > > I don't understand why manufacturers don't compress the signal more to get > higher bandwidth. Using tighter filters they should be able to get a 100x > more data throughput than they do. 1 Mhz appears to be worth 1 bit. Why > aren't they using 100hz for 1bit? Tighter filter, vast increase in > throughput, no more competition from cable/fiber. > > just saying, the manufacturers designers should pull their heads out of > their bosses butts and improve the designs they have instead of reaching > for higher bands which only function under rare conditions! > On 3/10/21 7:28 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > Everything above 7ghz experiences rain fade. No vendor can fix that. > On 3/10/2021 10:25 AM, Jan Van Kort wrote: > > Does this unit experience rain fade/fog issues? > On 3/10/21 7:15 AM, Jim Bouse [Brazos WiFi] wrote: > > AF5X-HD or AF11X if you want to stay in the UBNT ecosystem. > > Personally, I’d do 11X because the channel widths needed for backhaul are > better used in PTMP 5ghz. 11X will get you 500-600mbps at that distance. > > If you need more speed, I’d look at Aviat 11Ghz. > > > > Jim Bouse > Owner - Brazos WiFi > 979-999-7000 > http://www.brazoswifi.com > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> <[email protected]> *On Behalf > Of *Jan Van Kort > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 10, 2021 9:04 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] PowerBeam upgrade? > > > > We're using PowerBeam 5AC ISO for our links between towers. Is there a > higher capacity choice available yet? Our longest links are about 6-7 > miles. > > GAMs > > On 3/9/21 7:34 PM, James Howard wrote: > > My 3 year old who’s wearing it doesn’t need to worry about that. > > > > *From:* AF [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 8:59 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] tower take down > > > > That would be a good one of you were asking fbi to look into felonies with > potential domestic terror undertones (as low as that bar is set right now) > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 7:47 PM James Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you referring to a red version of a hat like this? > > > > > > > > *From:* AF [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:24 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] tower take down > > > > not a joke, but if you can get an image of any of those involved in a > particular red hat, FBI may actually take it up. > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:22 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > > guido sarduci. he will ensue recompense. > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:13 PM Jan Van Kort <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It was more than 10 years on that property, the company has changed hands > 4 times since I built it(the tower). We're now a utility company and > provide electric and telecom to a large portion of the county. Two owners > back the operators were real dicks and stole all the good stuff. We bought > it (the wireless company) back and upgraded the service with new stuff and > more bandwidth. > > But just the same, FCC stickers on telecom equipment always say it's a > felony. Just wondering if anyone has ever had to file a complaint? And > who to? > > GAMs > > On 3/9/21 2:37 PM, Colin Stanners wrote: > > I think that if you're talking about the power allocated through stickers, > the battle is already lost. > > > > Who owned the tower? Was it clear in the contract? As in that case they > should have no permission to make any changes to it. Was it fenced in or > otherwise had real access control? > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 3:51 PM Jan-GAMs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey, we had a tower agreement that included a 60 day notice. We found > the tower offline on our monitor system and went to investigate. > Someone had taken the guts out of the controller and threw them into the > weeds in the rain and had started removing the tower. It was a 3 legged > ham-radio tower 34ft model. The property owner had sent a weirdly > worded email just hours before about having her crew rehabilitate our > tower. How successful are the warning stickers about tampering with > telecommunications being a felony? Has anyone ever enforced that? > > GAMS > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > ------------------------------ > > *Total Control Panel* > > Login <https://portal.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net> > > To: [email protected] > <https://portal.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net> > > From: [email protected] > > *You received this message because the domain afmug.com <http://afmug.com> > is on your allow list.* > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > ------------------------------ > > *Total Control Panel* > > Login <https://portal.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net> > > To: [email protected] > <https://portal.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net> > > From: [email protected] > > *You received this message because the domain afmug.com <http://afmug.com> > is on your allow list.* > > > > > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
