The way I read it you have to feed the customers home with one of the antennas in order to re-distribute with other antennas on the same roof. I assume this means that technically I couldn’t order up a fiber circuit to the home to use to feed other APs on the roof… unless the customer is also getting their home fed service wirelessly. Maybe I could offer the home owner a “wireless backup” to the fiber to get around that sticking point?
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 5:45 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, more for governing entities like HOAs etc that try to regulate what the > home owner can/wants to do with their own roof/property or access to > broadband for their owned unit. > You couldn’t just pick any random roof and install any random equipment on it > under OTARD. The property owner still needs to be a willing participant and > probably also served by the equipment at some capacity. > But it does allow specifically now to re-distribute from that same owners > property at some capacity. Which was sort of implied before under OTARD kind > of, but now it’s specific and helpful for mini-pops. > > Not sure if WISPA had a hand at crafting that with them, but someone deserves > some credit for broadening OTARD. > > I don’t think personally I would try and go against an HOA and try to get > under specific contract or easement with all property owners and their > governing bodies first. > > From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via AF > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 5:21 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > Cc: Chuck McCown <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC and residential antennas (OTARD) > > I view this more to tell HOAs where to stuff it. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 25, 2021, at 3:30 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > That's not the way I read it. It prevents state & local governments from > imposing restrictions, but leaves the decision making up to the people who > are owners/operators. > > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > On 8/25/2021 2:24 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > Am I reading this shit right? Property owners can be forced to be transmit > locations? > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 4:07 PM Jacob Turner <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Yes: > https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/25/2021-01304/fcc-modernizes-siting-rule-for-small-hub-and-relay-wireless-antennas > > <https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/25/2021-01304/fcc-modernizes-siting-rule-for-small-hub-and-relay-wireless-antennas> > > ------ > Jacob Turner > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:12 PM Robert Andrews <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > There was a proposed modification to the FCC "blessings" for permitting > multiple antennas on residential buildings under OTARD. Did that ever > go anywhere? > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>-- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
