Well, that's shocking! Who could have possibly predicted that? On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 12:26 PM Chuck McCown via AF <[email protected]> wrote:
> It did result in greater cell tower density being fed by fiber. They told > city regulators it was needed for 5G so they let them do thing they have > never allowed before. > > *From:* Robert > *Sent:* Monday, December 27, 2021 10:34 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Not going to qork > > Sounds like it was very expensive marketing, but that's what is going to > happen when you have that kind of cash flow and are in a frequency bind.. > > On 12/27/21 7:45 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > > I have told people for years it is nothing more than marketing. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 27, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Jaime Solorza > mailto:[email protected] wrote: > > > Exactly...you can't fool mother na....ah, physics.. > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:13 AM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But then, we always knew that. Didn't we? >> >> Cells with a 500' radius. Yah, sure. That's gonna work. >> >> -- >> bp >> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 6:10 AM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/news/verizons-5g-mmwave-network-has-a-tree-problem/2021/12/ >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
