Don't you document where your splices are?  If you see your splices every
33k and see it's broken 1 mile from the last splice it should be pretty
obvious, no?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 6:26 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Magical device called a fusion splicer.  Our reels were typically 33,000’
>
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:51 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>
> I don't see how you have a 50 mile span.  Even if you get 80k reels that's
> 15 miles.
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:19 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When you have spans up to 50-75 miles at times, you have to use longer
>> high power pulses.  There is a lot of variability in velocity of
>> propagation, earth temperature, splice slack loops, fiber twist.  1 mile
>> error over 50 miles is only 2%.  You can easily be off by several thousand
>> feet.  You can’t just go dig.  You have to go to the closest splice point
>> and test again, even then if you it show the fault 2000 feet away and you
>> dig at 2000 feet you may be off by 20 feet or more.  I have been doing this
>> for decades.  Takes lots of digging to actually find it.
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:01 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>> A mile?!  IDK how that's possible.  Every time we turn a new splitter on
>> the sequentials and OTDR are within a few feet - we lose a couple of feet
>> in butt splices and our sequentials end up wrong.  Every new reel gets
>> tested on delivery and it's right on.
>>
>> When we had a broken fiber (ants) it was right on the case.  When we had
>> a broken fiber (ribbon got knicked with installation) it was between two
>> cases.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:48 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Wow, sometimes looking for gopher damager over 20 miles I have been off
>>> a mile.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 1:30 PM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>
>>> So far every time we've used the OTDR it's been accurate within 1 foot.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:55 PM Trey Scarborough <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The only thing you have to worry about with shorter cables is the
>>>> reflection. In some instances with dirty connector at just the right
>>>> connector you can get reflection back in to the transmitter that can cause
>>>> errors, the tx to shut down or premature failure. This is very uncommon
>>>> with LR 10G and less optics and can be prevented from making sure you have
>>>> clean connectors. Check the RX and TX levels and make sure you don't have
>>>> excessive loss. With 100G its a little different story due to the combined
>>>> power of multiple channels, but still can be prevented by cleaning
>>>> connectors, but in some instances Ive had to use attenuation when mixing
>>>> different vendor optics.
>>>>
>>>> The using no launch on an OTDR most automatically calibrating OTDRs
>>>> will work without one. Your results can be off though. Most of the lower
>>>> cost ones are also lower powered and have less of an RX sensitivity so they
>>>> don't suffer as much from the reflections interfering when testing. I can
>>>> test all day long with my little otdrs without one, but my long range 200k+
>>>> units I have to have a minimum of a 1k spool on it or you see ghosts. They
>>>> will show up as repeating events at even intervals. Not something you will
>>>> see on shorter runs either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/26/24 4:31 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I should note that apparently I used to do this with direct attach
>>>> cables (DAC) but I think that was a pain, one more thing to stock and to
>>>> bring with for projects.  Whereas I’d always have boxes full of SFPs and
>>>> fiber patch cords.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* AF mailto:[email protected] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2024 4:20 PM
>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:[email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> People say you need a launch cable but our cheap china OTDRs have no
>>>> issues seeing the connector at the end of the patch cable and stuff
>>>> beyond.  I bought a big launch cable back in the day and never use it
>>>> anymore.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Might be different with AE?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Only minimum length I know of is the OTDR dead zone.  If that is a
>>>> problem you purposely lengthen the cable with a launch cable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>>>
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2024 1:59 PM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reddit is wrong.  Gasp.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Connectors are loss, there is more loss in either one of the connectors
>>>> than there is the single mode glass.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Between a switch/router in a rack what I see all the time is long (like
>>>> 5/10/15 feet) cables and then put the slack in a loop along the posts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:19 PM TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Patchbox makes some great products, their fiber system is pretty slick
>>>> but expensive.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cable length is irrelevant it's optical budget / Rx signal strength.
>>>> Normally on 2-20k LR optics you are ok with any length cable, 40km+ needs a
>>>> pad on short spans. (Attenuator)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, 8:29 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is there a minimum length for a single mode fiber patch cable?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have been using 1 meter cables and they are almost always too long,
>>>> I’m talking about going between routers and switches in a rack, stuff like
>>>> that.  I see that FS sells 0.5 meter cables, but I saw somewhere like maybe
>>>> on Reddit someone claiming there was a minimum length.  Given SM fiber and
>>>> LR optics, I don’t see how 0.5 or 1.0 meter would be different they are
>>>> both essentially zero length.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Probably there’s some kind of cable tray or cable management solution I
>>>> could be using but I’ve never liked such things.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to