Im curious about the cellular solution

I have municipal traffic cams that I can see finding a cellular solution
for that wouldnt generate high usage bills or deprioritization for 24x7
streams

On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 12:54 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> You guys would know better than me on the specifics.
>
> I’m assessing bringing fiber to a bunch of police camera sites which are
> currently on cellular.  I was looking through their enclosure to assess
> putting an ONT in it.  They have a Meanwell 48V PSU connected to a terminal
> bus. The terminal bus feeds an industrial POE (802.3af) switch, and also
> the NO relay which passes power to a single port POE+ injector (802.3at)
> which powers the cellular router (Peplink).  Finally they have a poe port
> from the switch going to a poe extractor/splitter, and the dc output from
> that goes to the control terminals on the relay.
>
> So a poe port on the switch is dedicated to keeping the relay closed so
> that the POE+ adapter stays on.  And I assume they did that so they could
> use the auto-ping reboot.
>
> I met the customer today and said I thought there was a design issue in
> the camera box which would be effectively a time bomb causing sites to go
> down.  I asked how long it had been running and if they’d had any problems,
> and that’s when I learned it only been two months and two sites have
> already gone offline.
>
> Now here’s another possible dumbness: the router says 802.3at on the spec
> sheet, but it only needs 11-13 Watts.  I think it would have worked on the
> regular 802.3af poe ports without all the extra pieces.  I thought they
> were backwards compatible as long as you didn’t need the extra power.
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:54:25 AM
> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] SSR control circuit over voltage
>
>
> Oh, good point, optical isolation.
>
> I guess double the LED current could burn it out over time.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:46 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] SSR control circuit over voltage
>
>
>
> This going back into my fuzzy memory, but I was on a project where we used
> a bunch of SSRs back in ~~ 1990 or thereabouts. My recollection is that
> they used an LED internally. That may have just been the brand we were
> using at the time.
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 6/5/2025 7:52 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
> So if it’s a solid state relay, there’s probably a silicon controlled
> rectifier or triac and no actual relay coil?  The control voltage probably
> goes through a resistor to the gate of an SCR.
>
>
>
> I’m no expert, but I’m guessing they’re fine, especially if it’s been
> working all this time.  They may even have checked with the component
> manufacturer and verified it will work with the higher voltage.  The 30VDC
> spec might just be a UL thing.
>
>
>
> Perhaps it’s like 1N400x series rectifier diodes.  Do we really think they
> manufacture or test them differently to get 50, 100, 200, 400 volt
> ratings?  They’re probably all the same diodes just with different markings.
>
>
>
> If I were designing something for mass production, I wouldn’t do it.  I’ve
> certainly seen problems caused by designs that worked but the components
> specs were inadequate.  Like a manufacturer does a die shrink on a logic
> chip and it gets faster and now there’s a race condition.  Or a different
> manufacturer with an equivalent part gets substituted and now 48VDC is too
> much.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <[email protected]> <[email protected]> *On Behalf
> Of *Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:59 AM
> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] SSR control circuit over voltage
>
>
>
> I was looking at pictures of someone else’s enclosure (a camera company).
> They have a router powered through a NO solid state relay and they’re
> keeping the coil circuit energized continuously.  The specs on the relay
> say the control voltage is 10-30VDC, but these folks have a 48V power
> supply.
>
>
>
> I’m not sure how long it’s been in service (finding out today), but I’m
> wondering if this is a time bomb.  Is that relay going to fail?  What’s the
> likely mode of failure?  One article I saw while googling suggested the
> relay might get stuck on….not the worst thing, but it would defeat the
> purpose if that’s what happens.
>
>
>
> -Adam
>
>
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to