Nope, the coast guard is part of the treasury.  But they do share schools and bases with the navy  August 4, 1790

On 10/23/25 08:15, Bill Prince wrote:

I'm happy to be wrong, but I thought the Coast Guard was a branch of the Navy?

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 10/22/2025 9:43 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

Replying to myself, which is perhaps a sign I should be in therapy, but I just realized one reason why the Coast Guard is underappreciated or at least unknown compared to Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines.  They are part of DHS not DOD.

But now that DOD is calling itself the Department of War, maybe DHS is just fine.  Although one is Hegseth and the other is Noem, so flip a coin.

Coast Guard is also much smaller, has a smaller budget, and a much smaller PR budget.  No money to toot their own horn.

*From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 10:50 PM
*To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific

Yeah, but if it’s on the ocean, I’d prefer to see a Hawaii Five 0 style chase.  With McGarrett in a speedboat, and at the end he says “book ‘em, Danno”.

Besides, I think the Coasties are an underappreciated branch of the US military.

*From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 8:31 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific

I prefer to see cartels bombed. When they started moving the fent, they chose bombs. A little nose candy here and there, some dope, a little crystal, even some heroin was manageable. But these ducks decided to move shit that one mistake kills. Fuckbag dealers are putting it it club drugs and on vicodins.  Kids don't have a chance to make a mistake.

Bomb the shit out of them. Sink their boats, cut their life jackets, chum the waters, I don't care as long as they die. They don't want to give our kids a second chance, their adults deserve as terrible a death as possible. Idgaf about human rights, they don't, and I have no interest in the high road.

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025, 6:45 PM Dev <[email protected]> wrote:

    Turns out drug dealers sometimes get shot, who knew? Maybe they
    were delivering critical supplies to orphanages, because
    speedboats with three engines mean urgent care is being delivered
    expeditiously?

        On Oct 22, 2025, at 3:03 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

        Article on the latest generation of US Coast Guard “Over The
        Horizon” boats.

        
https://www.workboat.com/shipbuilding/test-driving-the-coast-guard-s-new-over-the-horizon-cutter-boat

        Generally deployed from a ramp on the back of a larger cutter
        along with helicopters. These things vaguely remind me of the
        WWII PT boats.

        I would not want to try and outrun the Coast Guard.

        *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
        *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 4:24 PM
        *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific

        Yes, and that's the primary argument against this practice.
        If we have solid intel that they're carrying drugs, and we
        know where they are, then as soon as they enter our
        territorial waters we can board the boat and arrest them. 
        The Coast Guard doesn't need a warrant or even a specific
        reason to board a boat.  Some of those boats are faster than
        Cutters, but I don't have solid info on how often they
        actually escape when they're already being tracked.  It's
        hard to imagine they really get away often because the Coast
        Guard also has helicopters, and they're allowed to continue a
        pursuit into international waters (and onto land) as long as
        the pursuit started in US waters.

        Regardless of how often they really get away, it's not normal
        to blow up someone's boat as a law enforcement action.  We
        also don't execute drug traffickers, and even when the state
        executes someone there's a trial first.

        but.....

          * post-911 we treat foreign terrorist organizations as
            enemy combatants

          * the executive branch gets to decide who counts as an
            FTO.  The sec of state, sec of treasury, and attorney
            general all have to agree, but they also all have the
            same boss.

          * Nobody can really stop the executive branch from
            declaring an FTO.

              o Congress could pass a bill to override someone's
                listing as an FTO, but to date they've never done it.

              o The courts could overturn an FTO listing, but for a
                lot of reasons it's almost impossible.

        So effectively the President and/or their cabinet has a
        completely legal pathway to authorize military force against
        just about anyone, and there's very little anyone can do
        about it.  It's not that I have sympathy for drug smugglers,
        it's that all we can do is take someone's word for it that it
        was a drug smuggler.  If anyone is totally comfortable with
        that then I'm curious what your rationale is.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        *From:* AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Ken Hohhof
        <[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 3:00 PM
        *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
        *Subject:* [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific

        _https://x.com/SecWar/status/1981049943306752361
        <https://x.com/SecWar/status/1981049943306752361>_

        I thought the Coast Guard was able to intercept boats and
        board them, arrest people and confiscate cargo.  I seem to
        remember they specifically acquired high speed boats that
        were a match for anything a drug runner might have.

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to