Because if the one SSID is two domains because of the two bands. Some devices like toasters work off broadcast.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2026, 6:06 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > But if you split the SSIDs, the only way the phone would connect at 5 GHz > would be if you told it to connect to that SSID. > > > > So is the idea that the human can more easily connect their phone to > NETGEAR87-GUEST than forget NETGEAR87-5G? Seems like they would still need > to either uncheck “connect automatically” when connecting to the guest > network, or forget it once the IoT device is set up. > > > > I guess I’m missing why a 2.4 GHz only guest network is different from the > main 2.4 GHz SSID assuming you have separate SSIDs for each band. > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Thursday, July 9, 2026 4:22 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 2.4 GHz only guest networks ... why? > > > > Because the smart phones will connect to the 5 GHz and that could > encounter issues when it sets up the device (ie different collision domain). > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 10:46 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > Many IoT devices especially cameras tell you to set up a 2.4 GHz only > guest network. This has me puzzled. > > > > The routers and mesh systems I am working with require you to turn off the > single SSID or band steering feature on the main SSID before you can turn > off 5 GHz on the guest network or alternate SSIDs. It seems like only more > expensive enterprise WiFi equipment give you more flexibility in this > regard. Have I just not tried enough router brands? I had the impression > this was a chipset limitation. > > > > But here’s what really puzzles me. Once I disable band steering and split > the SSIDs, why do I need a guest network? Let’s say I now have NETGEAR87 > and NETGEAR87-5G. Isn’t NETGEAR87 now a 2.4 GHz only SSID? Why do I need > to create a 2.4 GHz only guest network to make the camera happy? > > > > The only thing I can think of is they assume the user has already > connected their phone to both NETGEAR87 and NETGEAR87-5G (or joined those > networks, for iPhone people) and rather than tell them to forget > NETGEAR87-5G on their phone, it’s easier to have them connect to > NETGEAR87-GUEST. Or is there some technical reason I’m missing? > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
