On November 3, 2026 2:47:14 PM CST, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: >The lens was made out of a plastic mixed with alumina I think. Very high >index of refraction but had some loss issues. It would focus on a spot, now >if that spot had a single mostly square patch antenna like the original >canopy, they you are golden. But if not then it would not work as well. I >don't recall what the 430 and 450 had for antennas. > >I do know it could be used as a murder weapon and had about 7.5 dB when used >with a regular SM. So it was never a competitive threat to the stinger. I >don't have too much memory of the CLIP. > > > > >________________________________ >From: AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Adam Moffett ><[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2026 1:02 PM >To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] memory test - did Cambium LENS work with 450 SM? > >I thought the lens worked on all of them. I thought that was its selling >point. > > >________________________________ >From: AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, November 2, 2026 11:03 AM >To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]> >Subject: [AFMUG] memory test - did Cambium LENS work with 450 SM? > > >I think I discovered a 450 SM at a customer site still with a LENS. I thought >we got rid of all of those (they made nice doorstops and paperweights). > > > >Does anyone remember if you could use a LENS with a 450 SM? I thought it only >worked with 430 SMs, although I’m not sure why it would care single or dual >pol. I thought with 450 you had to use a CLIP or Stinger. > > > >Or am I remembering wrong, maybe confusing it with Chuck’s “focus ring”?
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
