--- [ Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote ] ----------------------------------- You're only hurting us all if you don't...
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:41:19 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mapping for FCC477 files Required is a very strong term if you don't provide a VOIP/POTS service, as it depends on if you actually believe (given the correct legal counsel) that the FCC has the legal authority to regulate you as a broadband-only fixed wireless provider. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 09/10/2014 04:56 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote: This filing I believe is REQUIRED by Oct 1 st for anyone else that don’t know. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. [email protected] – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net From: [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mapping for FCC477 files Seriously, do AFMUG people live under a rock? This has been on WISPA lists for several months. Yes, you now have to report coverage and customers starting with the next filing. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason McKemie" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 11:16:31 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mapping for FCC477 files OK, so I'm a bit confused. We're supposed to report our coverage, not just current customers? Is this a new requirement or have I just been doing it wrong all along? On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Cameron Crum < [email protected] > wrote: If you are only reporting by current subscriber data, I would say you are under reporting. We started out going this route for our billing customers and then I did a comparison to the estimated tower coverage radius and there was a very large difference in the number of blocks served even for our smallest customers. I would suggest that people look at doing this either by radius or by coverage plots (if you can get them in vector format) for the best results. Obviously, you want to show as many blocks in your area as possible while still being as honest as possible if the fcc will be using this data to fund your overbuild. On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Jaime Fink < [email protected] > wrote: Since a number of people are chiming in here, I figured I’d provide some info on our free tool we’re launching as part of our Cloud Services. Mimosa will be providing a free FCC Form 477 mapping lookup service. Based on your subscriber data exports, it will gather FIPS census Tract and Block information and generate the Subscriber and Deployment reports for download. Be on the lookout for detailed info and links to the free tool in the AM. Cheers! Jaime Fink • Mimosa • Chief Product Officer 300 Orchard City Dr Ste 100 • Campbell • CA 95008 • www.mimosa.co This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. On Sep 9, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Larry Smith < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Ok, assuming Chuck is really busy is anyone else providing a mapping service for the FCC477 reporting? -- Larry Smith [email protected] _______________________________________________ Members mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members _______________________________________________ Members mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members </blockquote>
