--- [ Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote ]
-----------------------------------
I do believe the UBNT team is working on something similar, among other
things of course.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 09/15/2014 09:22 AM, Animal Farm wrote:
--- [ Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote ]
-----------------------------------
I thought so too and it may be just a firmware "fix", but Doug at Blast brought
up that the Trango's throughput fades faster than AF24 due to using a more complex codec
on a smaller channel to achieve the same throughput. Bigger channels would be nice,
allowing for better than AF24 results.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 12:19:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 200Mbps unlicensed solution for 5 mile link
--- [ Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote ]
-----------------------------------
Trango's 24GHz solution I always thought was better than the AF24, if
only due to adaptive channel widths and antenna options. I haven't
looked to see how the SAF version compares there. It's more pricey than
an AF24 of course.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 09/15/2014 06:56 AM, Animal Farm wrote:
--- [ Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote ]
-----------------------------------
Is there a reason he can't go with licensed? It really sounds to me like it
would be the best option in this situation.
if 5ghz is out, 24ghz is the only way your going to get 200Mbps, but it's going
to drop occasionally... unless it never rains.
Something like a SAF 24ghz with bigger dishes might be a little bit more
reliable than an AF24 at that distance, but I'm not sure it would really make
much difference.
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 9:49 AM
To: Mathew Howard
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 200Mbps unlicensed solution for 5 mile link
--- [ Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote ]
-----------------------------------
Unlicensed? 5 miles? 5 GHz is your only option. 24 GHz and 60 GHz will not
reliably go that far.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 9:46:43 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] 200Mbps unlicensed solution for 5 mile link
--- [ Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote ]
-----------------------------------
Hello Kool Kats:
A friend of mine is looking for a solution that can pass 200Mbps from a
fiber feed from Axtel and shoot it to a mountain based POP. He has
several AF24 links in place and might use those but he asked me for
possible alternatives.
AF5 would be hard to deploy since everyone and their grandma is using 5Ghz
all around his POP. ideas?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
