--- [ Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote ]
-----------------------------------
This seems like an unnecessary hassle.  Why even use EC2/SES in the first 
place?  The amount of email generated by this list is not very high. If it were 
me, I would throw up a VM somewhere, install Postfix and Mailman and be done 
with it.

But.. Maybe I missed something.

Josh

> On Sep 15, 2014, at 8:40 PM, Animal Farm <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> --- [ Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote ]
> -----------------------------------
> Well, it appears this table is for the Free Tier, which is not what we are 
> signed up for.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:22 PM
> To: Paul McCall
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Official Annoucement - AFMUG list change
> 
> --- [ "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <[email protected]> wrote ]
> -----------------------------------
> I'm a little confused here..
> 
> Let's say you're sending 100K messages a day.  If these are going through SES 
> (like they seem to be), then aren't you going to get charged the prices
> listed at http://aws.amazon.com/ses/pricing/ for this traffic?   I.E.  0.10
> per thousand messages ($10/day $300/month), $0.12 per GB of attachments, plus 
> some amount for data transfer...
> 
> -forrest
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Animal Farm <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> --- [ Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote ]
>> -----------------------------------
>> Forrest, that is exactly what we did.
>> 
>> The relative setup was easy.  Flowing the email through Amazon....
>> ummmm... not so much.  Getting them to bless 100,000 emails a day required
>> very specific setup within Amazon to get that to fly.   200 message
>> responses x 500+ users... etc.  we have a 500K message limit per day, 
>> but its never peaked over 120K according to Brian.
>> 
>> I think we taught Amazon upper level techs something in the process, 
>> haha
>> 
>> We'll get there on the issue From field saying Animal Farm" only.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:31 AM
>> To: Paul McCall
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Official Annoucement - AFMUG list change
>> 
>> --- [ "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <[email protected]> wrote 
>> ]
>> -----------------------------------
>> I agree.  Kinda curious what prompted that choice.  Personally I would 
>> have probably just done the brute force approach of spinning up an ec2 
>> instance running postfix + mailman.
>>> On Sep 15, 2014 9:21 AM, "Animal Farm" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> --- [ Jon Auer <[email protected]> wrote ]
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> Wait, you're using SES to handle outbound for a listserv?
>>> That's a interesting architectural choice.
>>>> On Sep 15, 2014 8:39 AM, "Animal Farm" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> --- [ Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote ]
>>>> -----------------------------------
>>>> The list is "switching" over to being hosted on PDMNet's Amazon 
>>>> Cloud environment today.  For the moment, there are some things 
>>>> that will look different, such as the From field showing just Animal Farm.
>>>> 
>>>> To fix that, we have to work with Amazon's custom API to automatically
>>>> make each subscriber become a "trusted" sender.   It's a little more
>>>> complicated than that brief description, but we are working 
>>>> towards
>> that.
>>>> 
>>>> In the meanwhile, the sender's info will appear at the top of each
>>> message.
>>>> 
>>>> Paul
>>>> 
>>>> Paul McCall, Pres.
>>>> PDMNet / Florida Broadband
>>>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>>>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>>>> 772-564-6800 office
>>>> 772-473-0352 cell
>>>> www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com/>
>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> 

Reply via email to