but i do really like the interface on the 650
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:04 PM, That One Guy
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This is really beginning to irritate me, Now the guy
who replaced the gear is still blaming us for the
problems here, I moved the ubnt gear clear down to
like 5.1 or whatever the lowest channel is, the
spectrum at this and the remote site are deplorable.
The Signal/Noise ratio is moving around on the ptp650
and the Vector Errors are off the chart, but he still
wants to blame our equipment.
I can tell you it boils down to an improper system
repair post disaster. I pulled screen shots, both
before and after I moved our channels, showed them the
issue with their own colocated radios, turned on
assymetric channels, yes, they were running symmetric
in a high noise environment, nothing could go wrong
there, right?
Now tomorrow, my boss is going there to unplug our
radio, taking our customers down. Im betting some
utter nonsense like capacitant power or our antenna
shape ends up being to blame here.
I know ubnt is shit and bleeds noise allover, this
particular radio is a rocket m5 with the 30db dish and
the shield kit. The link is 90 degrees off both of
theirs (ours is west, they have one north and one
south) I believe we have 30 foot vertical sep between
it and their closest radio. I can see how a rocket
would magically destroy the whole 5ghz spectrum and
not have performance issues itself.I even cycled the
UBNT radios to make sure that they actually did change
channels.
ATPC power ranging not matching current TX output and
RX doesnt make any sense to me. Interference alone
will not alter RX power unless its very very notable.
And then to top it off its said it would be better to
move completely off the band to 3ghz since it cant
interfere. Yeah, great fucking idea, lets take the
only semi clean spectrum left and burn it on a
backhaul thats performing as it should because other
people dont know how to troubleshoot their own damn gear.
But the kicker to that would be "oh, you must still be
interfering, that m365 is actually a 5ghz radio
downconverted
how bout this, climb the damn tower and fix the fuckup
fucking meh
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:04 PM, That One Guy via Af
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Im not doing anything, this is a not my chair not
my problem issue.
This strike blew everything on the tower, if it
was electronic, it cooked, the switch was sitting
on back of the APC and welded to it even tripped
the breaker
Im just curious with these if theres any issue
with the ATPC on these bas boys
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:42 PM, David via Af
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Inspect the cables or at lease switch one or
both out at one end and see if a prevalent
change is made.
Could be a feed horn but unlikely I would
shoot for pigtails first.
On 09/23/2014 02:38 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
I just got done troubleshooting a 650 link
for our landlord we are coloed with on a
couple towers. I had not looked at the ptp
interface since the 500.
This thing is freaking beautiful, and I never
compliment anybody, especially on a web gui.
Sooooo much information, so easy to find.
one question though, They have atpc set to
-35 on these, does that basically turn atpc
off, or could it cause a problem?
Im pretty sure they have a loose antenna or
damaged feedhorn/patch cables (this was a
lighnting replacement of a ptp500, reusing
the cables/feedhorn)
The system statistics showed a variation of
received power ranging from -47 to -78 with a
peak of -110 , -78ish being current. Transmit
powers show a variation of -15dBm up to 21
dBm (I did not notice the negative value at
first). This would account for the range of
Received power except When the Status
screenshots were taken, the transmit power on
both units was at 21 dBm with a 77/78 receive
power on each side. If the output power is
accurate, the receive power on the remote end
would be at the peak, not the mean.
--
All parts should go together without forcing.
You must remember that the parts you are
reassembling were disassembled by you.
Therefore, if you can't get them together
again, there must be a reason. By all means,
do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance
manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You
must remember that the parts you are reassembling
were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't
get them together again, there must be a reason.
By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM
maintenance manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must
remember that the parts you are reassembling were
disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them
together again, there must be a reason. By all means,
do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must
remember that the parts you are reassembling were
disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do
not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
