And of course I also meant to add that for gigabit plus sync you'll have to go to a third party. On Sep 26, 2014 5:43 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af" < [email protected]> wrote:
> That is correct. One should also note that there are no cmm products > which do gigabit Ethernet. > > The cmm4 can be purchased with a Ethernet switch but it's a separate unit. > On Sep 26, 2014 2:36 PM, "Eric Muehleisen via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I believe the CMMmicro (CMM3) was the only CMM that contained >> hub/switches. Everything else was passthrough. >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If I am not mistaken, the original CMM had a hub. >>> >>> *From:* Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2014 10:16 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question >>> >>> My issue with the CMM-type products is they're all switched, correct? >>> I want no layer two devices between my radio and my router. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Adam Moffett via Af" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:54:45 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question >>> >>> >>> .....also the PMP100 SyncInjector from Packetflux ought to work with >>> ePMP. You might want the gigE version, but in the real world with a mix of >>> subscribers at different MCS levels I'm not sure how likely you are to >>> exceed 100x100. >>> >>> The CMM4 is a much more rugged beast. It is expensive, but you are not >>> likely to go back and wish you'd bought the cheap one. >>> >>> My plan is to hook up the internal GPS and have it available, but also >>> to provide sync over power. Once you are using GPS sync to re-use channels >>> it becomes critical that it's always working, so better to have two timing >>> sources available IMO. >>> >>> They have built in GPS if youre on a budget, not sure why alot of >>> people are so die hard against using it >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Grip via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I’m looking at ePMP w/channel reuse from a cost-comparison >>>> standpoint. Trying to figure out how much I need to spend on GPS synch for >>>> a 4 AP/ 2 channel cluster. Does it need to be a CMM4? I will want to be >>>> synching multiple POPs… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jeremy Grip >>>> North Branch Networks,LLC >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >>> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >>> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >>> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>
