Interference as in RF interference from others on the same or nearby channel is one thing.
Actively disrupting a legal communication is another thing. That is never legal. And since it is internet, and since internet is defined by the FCC as interstate in nature, actively disrupting interstate commerce can be considered an act of terrorism. They should consider themselves lucky. From: Eric Kuhnke via Af Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 11:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MARRIOTT TO PAY $600,000 TO RESOLVE WIFI-BLOCKING INVESTIGATION Marriott are dicks, but here's an interesting question... broad spectrum 2.4 or 5 GHz jammers are illegal, yeah. But is an 802.11-compliant device issuing deauth requests illegal, if part-15 devices are supposed to accept any unwanted interference and there's no recourse? Provided that the device issuing deauth requests is operating within spec for EIRP, channel plan, etc. On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hardy, Tim via Af <[email protected]> wrote: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-329743A1.docx
