I don't follow either Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
On Oct 4, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I haven't been feeling well today, so maybe that's why, but you lost me... ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ________________________________ From: "Josh Luthman via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:53:12 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 sector Well can't they use tiny channels and focus all the power in say a 5 MHz channel to make that distance carry the little traffic they expect? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 4, 2014 12:51 PM, "Mike Hammett via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: They do have one that is dual 5 GHz, though. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ________________________________ From: "Gino Villarini via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 8:28:54 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 sector No cause its dual band... not quad pol. Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com<http://www.aeronetpr.com> @aeronetpr On 10/3/14, 5:29 PM, "Josh Baird via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >Can't you do this on the ITElite dual band sectors? > >> On Oct 3, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Gino Villarini via Af >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> Alpha antennas makes a quad pol sectorŠ hmm 450 + epmp? >> >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> President >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> www.aeronetpr.com<http://www.aeronetpr.com> >> @aeronetpr >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 10/3/14, 5:18 PM, "Adam Moffett via Af" >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> We're actually really liking the 450 sector with the third 10dbi >>> connector. We first used it to put connectorized FSK radios on the >>> tower without adding another antenna. Since then we've discussed using >>> it with ePMP or other products just to have the third connector for >>> other uses. We like the idea that we can sneak another single polarity >>> 5.4 or 5.7 radio up without much fuss. >>> >>> I was wondering if they're going to keep making that antenna even >>>though >>> the FSK compatibility never worked out. Has the rumor mill heard >>> anything about it going away or not? Any official word from Cambium? >>
