The original article states that nobody has access to recordings of the
phone calls or the contents of the emails.
Maybe Conal was the jerk. What would someone have to say before you
called his employer and told them they employee was being bad?
Something serious I assume. Maybe Conal made threats or something.
The fact is we don't know, and slashdot rallies automatically against
the cable company because they're the cable company. Not that I love my
cable company....but the bias is quite clear.
Per the original article it doesn't sound like the guy was being a
jerk at all. Comcast was, in fact, the jerk.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Chris Wright via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That’s pretty shady, but this part of the editorial really ticked
me off,
“/Be careful next time when you exercise your first amendment
rights”/
//
The first amendment protects the rights of the people to speak
freely, but does not protect you from the consequences of being a
jerk.
Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless <http://www.velociter.net/>
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds via Af
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:17 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Comcast is getting really ticked about
complaints
Yeah I saw that.
PS - f@#$ /. beta ;)
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/07/2014 02:51 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote:
http://beta.slashdot.org/story/208189
�
Rory P. Conaway
4226 S. 37th Street
Phoenix, Az. 85040
602-426-0542 <tel:602-426-0542>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net>
�
