Oh, at that distance might as well use FSO.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Englhardt via Af" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 8:32:07 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Samsung: 4.6 GIGABIT WiFi, suck in a movie in SECONDS • The Register 60Ghz attenuates a lot by moisture. All vendors I talk to dont recommend more than 500m = 1/3 mile. Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett via Af Gesendet: Montag, 13. Oktober 2014 15:27 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Samsung: 4.6 GIGABIT WiFi, suck in a movie in SECONDS • The Register I can't wait. By short you mean like up to a mile? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Englhardt via Af" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 8:16:47 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Samsung: 4.6 GIGABIT WiFi, suck in a movie in SECONDS • The Register 60 Ghz band ist good for up to 500m ptp. There are products from silku, athena, sub10 Based on a 802.11ad chipsets this band might give dirt cheap short gigabit links. This is the only 802.11ad chipset I know of: http://wilocity.com/products/chipsets Von: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] Im Auftrag von Jaime Solorza via Af Gesendet: Montag, 13. Oktober 2014 15:02 An: Animal Farm Betreff: [AFMUG] Samsung: 4.6 GIGABIT WiFi, suck in a movie in SECONDS • The Register http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/13/samsung_promises_46_gbps_wifi_maybe_next_year/ Jaime Solorza
