My thought was that if you're paying to receive the content, they
shouldn't insult you by in effect charging you a second time with
commercials.
I'm sure their thought is, "the cable companies are paying to show this
content, and the customers are paying through commercials. ergo, we can
eliminate the middle man, and charge both to the customers."
bp
On 10/16/2014 4:10 PM, Chris Wright via Af wrote:
One would think that, but Hulu runs commercials and they're doing fine. That
said, I'm doing fine not giving Hulu any of my money. I want no part in paying
someone just to have them occupy my time with spam.
Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 3:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More over the top
That would seem insulting.
bp
On 10/16/2014 3:03 PM, Matt via Af wrote:
So will there still be commercials?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Gino Villarini via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
#diecabletv
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, October 16, 2014 at 3:05 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [AFMUG] More over the top
CBS
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/business/cbs-to-offer-web-subscription-service.html
Tushar
