They were saying in Albany that they'd tested it with 120 subs, but they
wouldn't suggest more than 50. They were touting the number 50 as being
about double what you'd normally see suggested for wifi based equipment.
How'd you arrive at the number 25? Did you have trouble with it?
Depends on customer density per AP. If you have low (<25) density, I
would recommend ePMP. Otherwise I would recommend 450.
Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
[email protected]
530.272.4000
On 10/17/2014 02:05 PM, TJ Trout via Af wrote:
I haven't been keeping real up to date on current generation ptmp
offerings but we have a new site going up and I need to decide pretty
quickly on some equipment. For the guys who have been using both 450
and epmp do you have any pros and cons ? Any reason to spend the
extra money when epmp seems to have the same if not better
performance , sync, etc?
My gut says 450 is going to be my best long term solution but with
all of the positive epmp feedback it's hard to justify the extra money?
