Those sites are gift horses. If on BLM land, you have to bear the cost of tearing it all down and remediation of the land when you are done. Toxic asset. Especially the diesel tanks.
From: TJ Trout via Af Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 8:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] On AT&T building A guy near me bought 2 mountain top sites with HUGE concrete buildings that have underground gas storage , generators, bedrooms, showers, etc for like $50,000 for 2 sites with the land and he used a bullet and wave guide adapters and is running a 802.11 link across those huge legacy horn dishes! On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:12 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af <[email protected]> wrote: I really wish no more of those will be destroyed, they are a part of communications history.. and we can put some really long links on them. :) Where they're not under Ma Bell's control anyway. On 10/20/2014 9:07 PM, Chuck Hogg via Af wrote: The cost to leave them is nothing. :) I've seen multiple buildings with them. Regards, Chuck On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Robert Bain via Af <[email protected]> wrote: The cost to remove them is to expense On Oct 20, 2014 6:52 PM, "Jaime Solorza via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: Wonder why they dont take them down? Not used any longer Jaime Solorza
