I was hoping it might be usable to replace a UBNT 3.65 link at 18 miles that is getting me only about 35 to 40Mbit of throughput. 60 to 70 Mbit would be a help. Not sure if that is a reasonable expectation
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 3.65 Sorry - didn't catch the extra P I have one 5.4 version running. It's actually better on throughput that I was expecting but we have seen long delays in getting it to establish a link even with excellent signal strength. Mark On 10/22/14, 12:27 PM, Paul McCall via Af wrote: I want to make sure we are on the same page. Not asking about the PMP450 3.65 I am asking about the PTP450 3.65 -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:05 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 3.65 I do have a 450 on a KP Omni with 44 customers on it. Seems to work quite well so far. The longest is at 2.9 miles, most are inside 1 mile. This is a very space constrained tower with a propensity for getting hit by lightning. At some point it will likely be converted to 4 sectors. Mark On 10/22/14, 11:53 AM, Matt via Af wrote: >> Anybody using these yet? Results? > Expensive. Works great. Omni results in less then half range if you > go that way though. -- Mark Radabaugh Amplex [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 419.837.5015 x 1021 -- Mark Radabaugh Amplex [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 419.837.5015 x 1021
