On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul McCall via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, we have forklifted 5 or 6 towers now from a Canopy 100 series 2.4. In > general, we have been happy. There is a lot to learn on ePMP planning and > best practices vs. the Canopy 100 series "set it and forget it". The > Frequency reuse and GPS does seem to work pretty well on ePMP. > > We have one POP that has UBNT and Mikrotik interference and that site is > giving us some challenges. Since going 802.11 2.4, we are abandoning the > "FSK C/I throne" to become one of the common folk. I find Cambium's > implementation to be better than the other guys, but interference is > interference, so to speak. > > But, I am not sure I would not be having the same exact "considerations" > using ANY radio with higher modulation requirements, including the 450 series.
I am really curious if the 450 would have done better in the face of interference vs the ePMP. I have not heard of anyone doing a good comparison yet. > > /shrug ? > > Overall, I give ePMP a 7.5 out of 10 with slow, regular advancements from the > software team.
