In the face of persistent interference, neither will do "well", but the
450 will do better simply because of the small frames.
bp
On 10/22/2014 2:18 PM, Matt via Af wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul McCall via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, we have forklifted 5 or 6 towers now from a Canopy 100 series 2.4. In general, we
have been happy. There is a lot to learn on ePMP planning and best practices vs. the
Canopy 100 series "set it and forget it". The Frequency reuse and GPS does
seem to work pretty well on ePMP.
We have one POP that has UBNT and Mikrotik interference and that site is giving us some
challenges. Since going 802.11 2.4, we are abandoning the "FSK C/I throne" to
become one of the common folk. I find Cambium's implementation to be better than the
other guys, but interference is interference, so to speak.
But, I am not sure I would not be having the same exact "considerations" using
ANY radio with higher modulation requirements, including the 450 series.
I am really curious if the 450 would have done better in the face of
interference vs the ePMP. I have not heard of anyone doing a good
comparison yet.
/shrug ?
Overall, I give ePMP a 7.5 out of 10 with slow, regular advancements from the
software team.
