Nah, because we all know MikroTik won't care... UBNT might actually do 
something if call them out on it. It seems to me like it should be a relatively 
easy fix.

________________________________
From: Af [[email protected]] on behalf of Josh Reynolds via Af [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?

If you're gonna call out UBNT on this, might as well call out the one company 
that doesn't seem like it's ever heard of a regulation that effects it or even 
the GPL: MikroTik.

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com>

On 10/22/2014 07:48 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
it only sets in the ap if you select a channel, if you give it a list it stays 
at full power. I wish WISPA would realize that they have absolutely no teeth 
and our membership dues have no return until our industry takes stewardship of 
the spectrum seriously. Its things like this that ensure the 5ghz rules are 
here to stay, WISPA has a better chance of sticking a straw up a unicorns hind 
end and blowing rainbow bubbles out its nose than getting the rules changed.

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mathew Howard via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That really bothers me too... the AP side will limit it to the legal limit 
(assuming you have the antenna size set properly), but the clients do not... 
I'm guessing there are an awful lot of NanoBridges out there running at 23dBm 
Tx power on DFS channels - which should be limited to 5dBm.

UBNT really needs to fix that.

________________________________
From: Af [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of That 
One Guy via Af [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:34 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?

I dont like that theyre not limiting power in those bands automatically, I 
thought they were supposed to

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Jason McKemie via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I didn't know the 5GHz Power Bridges ever had the ability to go that low 
(legally).

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Heith Petersen via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I assume that this does not apply to the Power Bridges. I am scared to update 
the few that are running 5.2 on older firmware to find out ;)

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of Bill Prince via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:33 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?

Go to the UBNT web site.  You have to register & they will send you stickers 
and an activation key that you enter on the System tab in the GUI.



bp
On 10/22/2014 9:51 AM, Sam Lambie via Af wrote:
Where the heck would one get an update key and how do you enter it into the 
radio? These radios are about 3 years old. This particular one worked just fine 
on Firmware 5.3 in 5.2...

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don't know. I've got ~9 Nanobridge M5 out there feeding towers on short hops, 
all listed UNII1 and half the links are running it.

Is this possibly an older unit before the UNII 2 band was enabled from factory? 
I wonder if the update key has to be entered to access UNII 1.



----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Lambie via Af<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?

Ok, I have a radio on the bench with 5.5.10 loaded and all I see is the 5.8 
band in AP mode. what am I missing?

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote
Works quite nicely. I've got a few out there. Nice to have 500+ MHz between 
feeds.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Hammett via Af<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?

Firmware 5.5.10 (actually, one of its betas was the first to offer it).


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[Image removed by                                                           
sender.]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[Image removed by                       
                                    
sender.]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[Image 
removed by                                                           
sender.]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[Image
 removed by                                                           
sender.]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

________________________________
From: "Sam Lambie via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:30:14 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Rocket M5 and 5.2 band?
I heard somewhere at WISPApalooza that the M series does 5.2 band now? Is that 
smoke and mirrors?
Sam

--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598<tel:575-758-7598> Office
www.Taosnet.com<http://www.newmex.com>




--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598<tel:575-758-7598> Office
www.Taosnet.com<http://www.newmex.com>



--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598<tel:575-758-7598> Office
www.Taosnet.com<http://www.newmex.com>





--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts 
you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them 
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- 
IBM maintenance manual, 1925



--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts 
you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them 
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- 
IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Reply via email to