Dennis, was it you who said you figured out or have knowledge of the btest at the coding level?
I have a project that I need that in the next month or so. -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess via Af Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 8:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik CCR and PPPoE No multi-core at all. Just optimization. Dennis Burgess, Link Technologies, Inc. 314-735-0270 -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson via Af Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 7:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik CCR and PPPoE They probably finally utilized the extra cores in the code. -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt via Af Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik CCR and PPPoE Recently updated to a 36 core CCR as a PPPoE server. Was having some issues with higher tier packages such as our office getting more than 20mbps through a single connection. IPv6 seemed to perform better then IPv4 for speed tests. Upgraded the CCR from v6.17 to v6.20. Now every pppoe connection is screaming fast. I don't know what Mikrotik did but something has changed. I wonder if they did anything with there BGP code? We have another one doing a couple gigabit full BGP connections. Seems to work fine but one core is almost always at 100 percent. Its currently running v6.19.
