The latency is in the standard, so they would have to deviate from it. Being SDR, I suppose they theoretically could, I just haven't seen it happen yet. Presumably the CPE are built around a standards based chipset, so it would probably mean an increase in price for those as well.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Rory Conaway via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do you say the latency would be significantly higher? That’s > manufacturer dependent since they aren’t locked to the full cellular PHY. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie via > Af > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 04, 2014 8:55 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Telrad LTE vs 450 3.65GHZ > > > > The 450 is going to smoke the Telrad from a latency standpoint. This is a > big downside to this gear IMO. If someone would optimize LTE for use in a > fixed environment you could possibly get better latency, but I'm not seeing > that happening. > > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Matt via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is anyone looking at both these options? Pros and cons of one vs > other? Throughput, Sync, Interference, spectrum efficiency, cost etc? > > What I really wander is can you bond two non adjacent 10MHZ channels > with Telrad to make a 20MHZ channel? I know you cannot with 450 and > it might become very useful down the road. Right now with 450 and a > perfect connection on a 20MHZ channel we can do around 80Mbps > downstream per sector. With a 10MHZ channel and not so perfect > connections that is really getting cut back. > > Also, right now we can do ABAB quite easily with 450 gear. With LTE > can we do AAAA where spectrum is scarce? > > >
