pmp500 was not expedience
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pre announce PMP500? ​wasn't that called Expedience or something? ________________________________ From: Af <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:10 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pre announce PMP500? I think the PMP500 is PMP400 based for the Euro 3.5 market. So Motorola did have a 3GHz solution all the way back then, but they didn't give two shits for US/CA 3650 even though we were begging for something for years. On 11/13/2014 10:31 AM, Bill Prince via Af wrote: Noticed this in the CNUT 4.6 supported device types list: PMP 400/430/500 Access Point (AP) PMP 400/430/500 Subscriber Module (SM) Did I miss the memo? -- bp <part-15@SkylineBroadbandService>
